Category Archives: Marketing

Do New Artists Need To Be On iTunes? No.

There’s a time at the start of every artists career when the only people that know about them is their friends, family and dogs. Beyond that, nobody else knows about them for whatever reason – they haven’t played a show yet, or they haven’t yet recorded.

But for some reason artists that I know seem to think one of the first steps to building a fan base is getting your music on iTunes. It seems to be the holy grail, and to a certain extent for the biggest artists it is. Even The Beatles (well, Paul and Ringo) realised that they needed to allow their music to be bought digitally, with iTunes being the biggest online music store. But is it really that important for a new artist to have their music on iTunes?

I’d argue that it isn’t necessary, it won’t make you any more money than you would from other sites (I’ll get at them in a minute) and its a little bit pointless. Whenever I hear about a new artist I check for their Facebook page, other blogs posts (if there is any), YouTube channel and twitter – in that order, descending order. I dont hear about a new artist and go straight onto iTunes to listen to a 30 second clip of a song.

It’s unlikely that new unsigned artists will have much luck getting their music on the iTunes home page, and most people won’t bother searching for them. Nowadays people (myself included) have become too lazy. They want to be able to listen to a song with one click. When I’m send new music I like a link that I can click on once, and then press play with one click – I don’t want to faff about downloading the file, opening it in iTunes and then having to press play, it’s way too much effort. And it’s the same with consumers. If they can go on a blog and press play, or click on a youtube video (preferably on the bands facebook page) then that’s much better.

Most people directed to the artists iTunes page will have gone there via a link (from their Facebook or twitter saying ‘buy my new EP ON ITUNES NOW! with a link to the iTunes page. This is how the majority of people that visit your iTunes page will get there.

For this reason, why not just post a link to your bandcamp site. People will still click on the link, they can actually listen to the songs in their entirety and you get to choose how much you sell it for, if anything.

iTunes can be a very valuable tool for established artists. Millions of people have iTunes accounts, so it would be silly not to have your music there if you’re an established artist. It’s also the number one store, with the highest amount of users and subscribers, so it makes sense to have your music up there as the majority of music fans has an Itunes account and so they don’t have to type in their card details each time they buy a song.

But for artists that are at the early stages of their careers I would say dont bother. You’ll have to pay a site like CD Baby or Tunecore to get your music on iTunes (as well as the other online stores – 7digital, Napster, Amazon, etc) and it’s really not worthwhile. If you put a link to your bandcamp site on your Facebook you will still get just as many people heading to that site if the post is marketed properly.

So save your time (and money) and use bandcamp if you’re a new artist. Don’t worry about your music not being on iTunes, because at the end of the day you probably care more about being on there than your fans do.

PS I don’t work for bandcamp, honest!

About these ads

Lana Del Rey vs Adele

Lana Del Rey – Born To Die Album Verdict: It’s pretty good.

That’s it. It’s pretty good, not amazing, not shit. Lana fan-boys can’t bleat about it being album of the year; The Maccabees 3rd offering is already higher on my lists of 2012 albums and there’s plenty more albums to be released this year that will equal if not better Del Rey’s album.  It’s also not shit so all the ‘haters’ will have to eat their words.  With it being just a good album, hopefully NME will stop with their five-Lana Del Ray-posts-a-day. Ya see, people don’t like things that are shoved down their throat. They like to feel like they discovered stuff themselves.

Alot of people had heard the name ‘Lana Del Rey’ before they’d even heard her music. And if they had heard her music, they’d only heard Video Games. People got pissed off with her before she’d even released her album. Yes, the whole manufactured, plastic lips debate emerged, but mainly people got pissed off because the hype that surrounded her was completely unwarranted. Yes, she has a nice voice and yes, she looks good, but she’s not going to change the world. Fuck, I doubt her album will even be in the charts come November.

Take Adele, for example: yes, she got a quite a bit of hype around the release of 21, but she already had an album out – not an amazing album, but a good one – and it was a stepping stone to her becoming the megastar that she is today.

The problem with Lana is that the only way is down. She’ll never be able to release a song as good as Video Games. She’s played her one and only hand, a great hand, and now she’s going to have to fold. I suppose it’s the same with Adele as well. She’ll never be able to top 21 - there are only a handful of albums that will sell that many records in the next decade, and the chances of one artist having 2 in that list has to be slim.

Personally I quite like Lana Del Rey. I think the album is pretty strong with some great tracks and some not so great tracks. But I just feel it’s a shame that she was never going to live up the hype. The hype was ridiculous, and in last week’s NME she was on the front cover and there was an advert for her album on the back cover. Mental.

People don’t want to have music shoved down their throats. They want to discover it themselves, even if they are nudged in the right direction through good marketing.

Adele’s career blew up after her amazing performance at the Brits. Something I hope happens to Ed Sheeran when he performs at the Brits later this year (he’s already massive, having sold over 2 million copies (albums, singles and EPs combined). 21 had already sold bucketfulls, but the Brits performance took her across the pond and into the homes of millions people. But the big thing with Adele is that she’s a normal girl. She lives with her mum in Tottenham (although for how much longer I don’t know), she’s a good looking girl but she’s not Hollywood stick-thin. She smokes and she drinks. The British public can relate to her. She’s just like them. She’s a normal girl.

How many people can relate to Lana Del Rey? Her dad is a millionaire, she’s very pretty and she lives in New York. This is fine but I think she’s more popular over here in the UK, and nobody can relate to her in that way. She’s also seen as ‘an act’ – when performing it’s not natural. You can see her counting and thinking about where her arms should be rather than the whole thing being natural. Thing is it’s probably the same with Adele, she’s probably been taught how to act on stage and what to do but she’s had more practise, having learnt it all at Brit School. A big difference between Adele and Lana is their personalities. Yes, of course 2 pop stars from Tottenham and New York are going to be different. But Adele somehow seems so much more human. She seems like a laugh and you’d like to go to the pub with her. If Lana came she’d sulk in the corner, pouting without adding much to the conversation. I’m sure she’s lovely, but we don’t get to see that side, because the poor girl is terrified. She’s been shoved into the limelight and she’s still learning. I understand why her label have put our hew album now – she’s everywhere, the hype is all consuming. But it somehow seems rushed.

It’s looking pretty certain that Lana Del Rey’s album will go to number 1 this week (at the time of writing she’s sold 70k (Wednesday), so well on her way to number 1), but how long will it stay there? 1 week? 2 weeks? 3 at most. She’s not an artist that can have a long sustained career unfortunately. She’s been marketed too hard, too quickly and the novelty will wear off soon. Which is unfortunate. I like her, think she’s got something about her and wish her well for the future, but unfortunately I think her career is over before it’s even started. Which is a shame.


Nine Inch Nails

I thought I’d take a look at one of the best marketing campaigns that I’ve seen in recent years, Nine Inch Nails and their marketing campaign for the album Ghosts I-IV.

Back in 2010, Trent Reznor announced that the new Nine Inch Nails album would be released, with Ghost I available to download for free (Reznor even put it up on the Pirate Bay for people to download the 9 songs). Different versions of the album were available to buy, going from a free download to a $300 super deluxe version complete with blu-ray disc, DVD, 2 books and all four CD’s. All 2,500 copies sold out in the first day, making the band $750,000 in 24 hours. By this time NIN had split from their label, Interscope, and so that money wasn’t divided up to give the band nothing; the only deductions were manufacture, distribution and packaging.

You could also download all 4 albums for $5, buy the 4 albums on CD for $10, and buy a deluxe box for $75.

In the first week the band had made $1.5m.

Even if people decided not to pay, Reznor would still acquire their email address, which would give him the chance to flog them more products in the future.

The secret of Trent Reznor’s success is that he knows how to connect with his fans whilst also giving them a reason to buy. Like Bjork did with her album Biophilia, he made his fans want to buy the super deluxe box by making it exclusive, making it look nice and making people feel like they’re supporting the band, which they were.

Another marketing ploy by the band came on their 2007 European tour. Nine Inch Nails printed t-shirts with the tour dates on the back, with random letters highlighted slightly. These letters spelt out ‘I AM TRYING TO BELIEVE’. The more savvy fan then put .com on the end, which let to an online interactive game. The possibilities were endless, and you can bet that when fans found it they told every other fan they could!

Reznor knows that fans are the best marketeers. They will post stuff on their facebook, twitter, blog, and you know that they mean it. They’re not getting paid to promote the band, they’re doing it because they want to, because they like the band. Reznor understands this better than most.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 441 other followers